Britney Defends Foolish Child Endangerment
I am beginning to wonder if Britney Spears and Michael Jackson have the same child-rearing coach. Now that I’ve lost your attention by putting MJ, child, and rear all in the same sentence, let me try to explain. Recently Britney has been photographed driving with her infant son, Sean Preston, on her lap. She tries to defend her actions by claiming she rushed her son into the car and took off, since evidently the paparazzi following her were intent to eat her child’s brain. Quotes the mentally deficient baby-factory,
“I instinctively took measures to get my baby and me out of harms way, but the paparazzi continued to stalk us, and took photos of us, which were sold to the media.”
Oh, well that clears everything up, then! You’d rather opt to put your first-born’s life in danger than (God forbid) garner him any publicity. That makes sense. Stupid bitch.
Look, I can understand that the paparazzi can be tremendously irritating at times. In fact, if they were actually putting Sean Preston in peril, I hope the fuckers responsible were locked away and anally raped by a big guy named Ramrod. But nowhere in the article did it say the camera-hounds were any kind of a threat to Britney or her son. In fact, the ONLY person who put him in danger was Britney. Please God, call Child Protective Services and take care of this ignorant fuck. I promise I’ll stop kicking puppies if you do.
Source: Hollywood Backwash
RELATED POSTS:
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|