From molester to abductor?
We've all heard the stories (from Michael Jackson himself) about how he was so excited the moment his first child was born he just grabbed him and ran out of the hospital, leaving the mother, Debbie Rowe, torn and insignificant. Well, that could have pretty much been a metaphor for how Michael treats his children, as evident from Michael's unapologetically taking the children and moving to Bahrain. As far as he's concerned, they're his, and Debbie has no right to claim them as part of her. Well, it appears the baby factory has finally grown balls, because she has filed papers noting his devious and illegal acts to gain full custody of the children, and is working on a court order to get them back to the States.
I'd love to say, "Way to go, Debbie!," but frankly I'm just wondering what took her so fucking long. She's been a submissive little wimp about all this shit even after their divorce. No self-respecting PERSON, much less mother of a bunch of beautiful tow-headed children like the three in question, would allow some man who wasn't even their real father to abduct them. Oh, did I forget to bring that part up? Well, why should I? It's obvious they aren't Michael's real children. Sure, the very fact that almost the entire Jackson family has bleached their skin and replaced just about every afrocentric feature they could find doesn't mean shit to me. See, I remember a pre-vitiligo Michael Jackson, and that guy was inarguably black. Need more proof? Look at Tito. He hasn't done shit to himself.
Nope, there's a good reason Michael keeps his "children's" heads covered, and it isn't because he wants them to have anonymity or just part of his quirky behavior. It's because he's afraid that if the public were to to actually see their faces, then we'd all realize they looked whiter than Pat Boone and therefore know they aren't his. I've seen many a mixed child in my day, and though they're generally cute as hell (assuming one of their parents aren't grotesque,) they tend to take on more obvious black traits. There is that possibility that Michael has taken measures to bleach his children and possibly get plastic surgery done for them, but if that's the case, I'd personally be the first to throw a brick at the kiddie-fucker for mutilating babies.
So what do I think Debbie should do? Well, for starters maybe she should stick to her original story about how the children aren't really Michael's, and NOT retract her claim shortly afterwards. Then we the SANE people of America should support her right to full-custody of them and urge our courts to impose legal action to have him return them to her. If anything, we should at least demand a DNA test to prove whether or not they're his. But if he refuses ANY of this, we should throw his ass in prison. Let's face it, the guy's a fucking child-molester, and should have been locked up in the early 90's. But unfortunately justice is not only blind, but deaf and dumb as well. Maybe it's time the dubious lawyers and ignorant judges learn the risks of letting an obviously pathological sex-offender like him get away with shit like this because of his high-profile status. It's like my granny used to say, "If one person thinks you're a kiddie-fucker, well, you can't please everybody. But if EVERYONE thinks you're a kiddie-fucker..." Or something to that extent. My granny is strange.
RELATED POSTS:
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
|
|
|
|